The discourse of the Arab and Iranian electronic press on sectarian conflicts (Sunni - Shiite) in Syria - Yemen and Iraq

The study aims to monitor, analyze and interpret the features and dimensions of the discourse of the Arab and Iranian electronic press for sectarian conflicts (Sunni-Shiite) in Syria, Yemen and Iraq, and to reveal the active forces in the sectarian conflict (the issue of the study), and to identify the strategies of the active forces in managing that conflict, and this study belongs to the category of descriptive analytical research, and relied on the media survey methodology and the comparative approach, using the discourse analysis tool, and relying on the two entrances to the analysis of the media framework and conflict management, and by applying to the Egyptian Al-Ahram website and Kayhan The study reached many results, the most important of which are: The agreement of the two newspapers that the first actor in the sectarian conflict (the districts of the study) are the Arab states and regimes, in Al-Ahram Egypt was the first positive actors in the Yemeni sectarian conflict, and in Kayhan Saudi Arabia was the most negative actor in Yemen, the cooperation strategy ranked first of the total strategies used by the active forces in managing the sectarian conflict (Sunni-Shiite) in Syria, Yemen and Iraq in the electronic newspapers Al-Ahram and Iranian Kayhan, followed by The strategy of power and control, and in third place came the adaptation strategy, and the third party strategy ranked fourth, and the fifth place was for the excitement strategy, and in sixth place appeared the strategy of calm, and the negotiation strategy came in seventh place, and in eighth place was the strategy of avoidance, then the bargaining strategy came in ninth place, and by a few percentage the mediation strategy came in the tenth and penultimate place, and the settlement strategy was the least used by the active forces in the conflict (study issue), It came in eleventh and last place.